top of page
Search

Is it time to focus on your team and unlock their potential?

  • rachael864
  • Sep 8
  • 4 min read

Updated: Sep 25

The external world your teams operate in is changing faster and more unpredictably than most strategy cycles assume. Just see the Word Uncertainty Index! (https://worlduncertaintyindex.com). Technological acceleration, climate risk, geopolitical shifts, and demographic change are reshaping stakeholder expectations, talent flows and the licence to operate. Employee dissatisfaction is also on the rise (https://www.gallup.com/394373/indicator-employee-engagement.aspx). 


At the same time, cultural dynamics—declining trust, fractured attention and hybrid working—mean that teams must do more than execute. They must sense, adapt, and co‑create outcomes across organisational boundaries. Systemic team coaching, often paired with Executive Coaching, equips leaders to do exactly that: align teams to purpose, strengthen employee engagement, and convert complex disruption into strategic advantage.


What is Systemic Team Coaching (STC)* is and why it matters?


STC works with the whole team - together and in parallel with individual conversations - to align on purpose, develop collective leadership, improve performance, and engage key stakeholders. It explicitly connects internal team dynamics with the wider organisational and external system, so that teams learn to act with foresight rather than merely react to crises. 


Why this matters for executives:


  • It moves teams from siloed delivery to collective accountability for strategic outcomes.

  • It accelerates strategy implementation by aligning goals, roles, and stakeholder interfaces.

  • It creates psychological safety for tough conversations that materially affect execution and risk management (https://hbr.org/2023/02/what-is-psychological-safety)

  • It makes teams more resilient to shocks and more effective at sustaining innovation.


When to commission The-Team-Lab?


Prioritise STC when one or more of these conditions exist:


  • Strategic change requiring rapid cross‑functional delivery (merger, major launch, digital transformation).

  • Leadership transition where the incoming leader must realign and rebuild trust.

  • Persistent underperformance where misalignment, unclear purpose or stakeholder disengagement are suspected root causes.

  • Formation of cross‑functional or cross‑cultural teams with ambiguous accountabilities.

  • The executive team needs to model new ways of working and collective leadership for the wider organisation.


If the primary issue is a single underperformer, legal/HR matters, or substantial individual capability gaps, start with targeted performance management or one‑to‑one development; systemic team coaching can then follow to embed collective change.


 What to expect?


A practical STC engagement typically includes:


  • Initial system inquiry - interviews with team members, sponsors, and key stakeholders to map expectations, constraints, and network dependencies.

  • Diagnostic observation - attending core meetings and reviewing artefacts to spot misaligned ways of working.

  • Focused interventions - facilitated sessions that clarify purpose, co‑create measures of success, renegotiate roles and simulate stakeholder interactions.

  • Embedded practice - coaching during routine work (meetings, planning cycles) so learning is applied in business‑as‑usual.

  • Sustainment - governance and sponsor involvement to convert early wins into systemic change.


Executives should expect outcomes such as clearer team purpose and priorities, faster decision cycles, improved stakeholder advocacy, restored trust and measurable performance improvements against strategic KPIs.


Action points for C-suite sponsors


  • Provide visible sponsorship. Publicly authorize the work and protect the team’s time to engage; sponsorship is the single biggest predictor of success.

  • Commission a diagnostic, not a one‑off workshop. Prioritise an initial system inquiry that includes stakeholder interviews and observation.

  • Decide the boundary conditions. Clarify accountabilities, available resources, and the team’s mandate so coaching focuses on solvable levers.

  • Expect integration with business rhythm. Require the coach to embed learning into existing meetings and planning cycles so change is operational, not purely theoretical.

  • Prepare to act on findings. Use coaching outputs to inform structural decisions (role adjustments, resourcing, sponsor changes) rather than treat them as cosmetic improvements.

  • Pair team and individual support where needed. If capability gaps threaten delivery, run targeted one‑to‑one executive coaching alongside team work, with clear governance to manage confidentiality and conflict of interest.


Common Concerns or Questions 


  • “Our team isn’t stable enough.” Stability matters less than a shared, time‑bound objective and mutual accountability. If a group must deliver a strategic outcome together, team coaching is appropriate.

  • “We don’t have time.” Coaching integrates into existing work - observation and coaching during meetings, and short workshop sprints complemented by applied practice.

  • “One person is cynical.” Experienced coaches surface and work with that dynamic. To have a critic can be helpful in voicing the unspoken. 

  • “Will it replace leadership development?” No. Team coaching complements individual development by shifting how a group coordinates, decides, and holds itself accountable.

Quick checklist before commissioning The-Team-Lab

  • Have I articulated the team’s strategic deliverables and key stakeholders?

  • Have I committed calendar time and executive sponsorship for the programme?

  • Will I act on diagnostic recommendations, including structural or sponsor changes?

  • Have I budgeted for a diagnostic plus a minimum three‑month embedded programme?

  • Will I measure success by changes in team decisions, stakeholder engagement, and delivery outcomes, not just workshop satisfaction?


This approach is not a silver bullet, but for leaders facing complex, interdependent challenges it is a practical investment: it converts external volatility into purposeful team action, restores trust and alignment, and accelerates the delivery of strategic priorities. 


For executive sponsors who want teams that think beyond their remit and deliver across the system, commissioning a diagnostic‑led team coaching engagement—paired with focused Executive Coaching Services—is a key next step. It’s a key to unlocking your leadership team effectiveness.


© the team lab 2025 with www.eyedeer.co.uk

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page